Your Cart is Empty
"Minimum 24 pieces" used to be a standard line in any print shop quote. DTF changed that. Here's why it matters more than most people realize.
When a supplier requires 24 pieces, you have two choices: order 24 even if you need 12, or go elsewhere. If you order 24, you're paying for 12 decorated garments you either have to sell later, write off, or store. That overstock cost is real — it's not free just because you might sell it eventually.
For a $20 decorated tee with a $10 cost, ordering 12 extras to hit a minimum means $120 in tied-up capital. Not catastrophic, but it happens on every run you don't have exact quantities for. Over a year, it adds up.
No-minimum ordering means you can fulfil exact quantities. A customer asks for 17 shirts — you order 17 transfers, press 17 shirts, and deliver 17. No leftover inventory, no speculation. For event merchandise, school spirit wear, and sports team gear where quantities are demand-driven, this is the correct model.
Before you order 50 shirts in a new design, you can order 3. Press them. Show them to customers or photograph them for your online store. If they sell, reorder. If they don't, you've lost $30 instead of $500. The ability to test designs at small scale is a meaningful business advantage for anyone selling custom apparel online.
Our practical minimum is a $10 gang sheet. Below that, the economics of printing, packaging, and shipping don't work in anyone's favour. Above $10, you can order any quantity you need — one transfer, ten, or ten thousand. The per-unit price drops as your sheet fills up more efficiently, but there's no floor on what you can order.
Screenprinting still has minimums — setup costs are real and need to be amortized across a run. If you're doing a simple two-colour print on 100+ identical garments, screenprinting may still beat DTF on per-unit cost. But for anything complex, multi-coloured, or variable across the run — DTF, no minimums, wins.